What Pet Should I Get? (1960 Versus Now)

New York Times Best Seller List August 23 2015These days, when Harper Lee and Dr. Seuss top the best seller list for “new” books they wrote decades ago, it feels more like 1960 than 2015. Harper Lee’s Go Set a Watchman, the sequel early draft of her Pulitzer Prize winning To Kill a Mockingbird, and Dr. Seuss’s What Pet Should I Get?, a recently rediscovered picture book, have been breaking sales records this summer (see here and here).

I’m wary of literary estates (or lawyers of living clients who act like they’re representing estates) hawking every last item their deceased authors ever touched—if the author had wanted to publish it, they probably would’ve—but I still decided to purchase the ebook version of Dr. Seuss’s newest book.

We own many of Dr. Seuss’s classics, including Happy Birthday to You!, which recommends a pet as a present and includes the sentiment that “the best pet is the tallest of all-est,” a line my tall four-year-old appreciates (as I discussed in Updating Dr. Seuss for a 21st Century Kid).

I’d been wondering whether What Pet Should I Get? contains a similar opinion about the ideal size of a pet. So, yesterday afternoon, my daughter and I decided to find out.

The book, which stars a pair of round-faced siblings who have to agree on what pet to get, certainly has a mid-20th Century feel to it. Not only is it in the typical style of Dr. Seuss’s 1950s and ‘60s hits, but, as the publisher’s note points out, there’s another antiquated aspect to the story:

“When Dr. Seuss wrote What Pet Should I Get? over fifty years ago, it was common for people to simply buy dogs, cats, and other animals at pet stores. Today animal advocates encourage us to adopt them from a shelter or rescue organization…”

Pet ownership has changed in other ways too. For example, fifty years ago, the poodle was America’s favorite purebred dog. Now, it’s the labrador retriever. Dogs and cats remain popular pets (members of the family!), but their popularity has declined. According to the the most recent U.S. Pet Ownership and Demographics Sourcebook (2012), pet ownership overall has dropped by 2.4 percent.

Maybe pet ownership would increase if we could adopt the types of animals that are available in Dr. Seuss’s What Pet Should I Get?, which includes not only cats and dogs, but new kinds of pets like:

A pet who is tall with image from Seuss Book

My daughter liked this pet best of them all too.

What she didn’t like, though, was this book’s frustrating ending, which is … spoiler alert!that we never find out what pet the siblings get.

Drawing from the Seussian canon, my daughter guessed, “They probably took home a cat with a hat on a mat.”

I asked her to show me what that pet would look like, and after a couple of minutes, she came up with this:


She explained, “It’s actually a really tall bird. The cat, hat, and mat are invisible.”

Here’s the four-year-old artist:

IMG_5817 (2)


*Remember how hard the Faulkner estate “works” to stay in the limelight?

**I’m not going to read Go Set a Watchman, but if you have and want to chat about it or if you’re interested in spoilers, check out the discussion at Socratic Salon.

***The “best sellers” image is a composite from The New York Times webpage (accessed on August 16, 2015).


  1. I need to get that Dr. Seuss book, it sounds fun.
    We have a tropical fish as pets. Easy, and they don’t trigger my spouse’s allergies. 😉

    1. It’s a cute book (even if Dr. Seuss didn’t think it was quite good enough for publication!). The ending is frustrating, but at least it leaves it up to the child reading it to imagine what the kids might’ve brought home.

      I hope you’ve had a great weekend!

  2. I agree that estates seem to be in it for the money and not necessarily for the reputation of the writer. I suspect that Theodore Geisel didn’t publish this book when he wrote it because he was concerned about the ending. Such uncertainty at the end of a Dr. Seuss book could bother some small children, and that was not his interest. Are writers to worry about destroying all their unpublishable work before they go gaga or die to prevent this kind of opportunism?

    Not that I think my work will find such an elevated desire for more, more, more! And just as well, since I don’t want to kill my babies, even the ones that didn’t come out so well!

    1. You might be right that Dr. Seuss didn’t publish the book because of the ending. It’s frustrating, but at least it leaves it up to the reader to imagine what the kids might’ve brought home.

      “Are writers to worry about destroying all their unpublishable work before they go gaga or die to prevent this kind of opportunism?” Yeah. I wonder whether a celebrity can prohibit publication and other forms of opportunism in his/her will (probably not, legally speaking, but it might dissuade heirs from doing it).

  3. Cute drawing! I would think this book represents the perfect opportunity to bring up some of the other points you mentioned, such as adopting from a shelter or not getting a pet until one is ready for the responsibility. Or even a discussion of how times have changed. I love that reading together can open up those discussions! 🙂

  4. I knew about the Harper Lee book, but I had no idea a “new” Dr. Seuss book existed! Thanks for the enlightenment! I LOVE Dr. Seuss. (I mean…who doesn’t, right?) 🙂

    1. I agree. Personally, my roommates and I wanted to adopt a specific kitten at one point, but we knew that we couldn’t handle having a pet at that time, due to financial instability and work schedules. We went back later and were able to adopt that same cat when we were in a much better place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s