Mr. AMB on Gone With the Wind (& Looking for the Past in the Future)

Gone with the Wind CoverWhen AMB recommends I read something, it’s the next book on my Kindle. But Gone With The Wind? Really?

The glamorizing of antebellum slavery and the appalling descriptions of the effects of African American enfranchisement are, to say the least, off-putting.

However, the political controversy surrounding the book wasn’t what made me reluctant to read it. To me, saying that there are “books people shouldn’t read” is almost as bad as banning books. The question should never be whether people shouldn’t read a book at all, but rather what context is necessary to properly understand the book. Anyone who reads Gone With The Wind as history, instead of as fiction, is a fool.

Rather, my concern was: do I really want to read a thousand-page romance?

It’s hard for me to imagine anything less interesting than the emotional convulsions of a 16-year-old girl trying to attract the attention of all of the boys at an antebellum ball. Yet, even in the earliest pages of the book, I couldn’t put it down. The prose is so rich, and the descriptions of Scarlett’s thoughts so vivid and compelling, that the reader is immediately drawn into the world. Having just finished the novel, I wish there were another thousand pages to read.

In Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut wrote: “There is one other book, that can teach you everything you need to know about life… it’s The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky, but that’s not enough anymore.” Maybe he could have filled that void with Gone With The Wind, a novel that takes the typical “serious” subjects of philosophical novels and dashes them against the rocks of reality. Scarlett is confused by high art, dismissive of any religious sentiment, and contemptuous of the “Cause” that guides her Southern contemporaries throughout the novel. That is understandable: none of those ephemeral concepts did her a lick of good in the fires of Atlanta or the desolation of Tara. She was saved, and saved those around her, through willpower alone.

As I read Gone With The Wind, I kept thinking of psychologist Irvin Yalom’s observation, “The neurotic obliterates the present by trying to find the past in the future.” (Link.) All of the main characters are, in one way or another, stuck in a past that is – you’ll have to excuse this phrase – gone with the wind. Indeed, the whole of Southern society is stuck in the dream of rebuilding for themselves a world that will not and can not exist again.

Scarlett, however, has taken a truly Stoic view of the situation, putting aside nagging thoughts about the past and its principles with the mantra, “I will think about this later”– except, importantly, when it comes to Ashley Wilkes, into whom Scarlett has unwittingly channeled the entirety of her unreasonable nostalgia. Even Rhett Butler, described by Scarlett as “strong and unscrupulous, passionate and earthy,” is at core driven by a sentimentality so deep he does not even realize its effects.

As psychologist Donald Winnicott observed, “the absence of psychoneurotic illness may be health, but it is not life,” (link) and it is in that “illness” that Gone With The Wind comes alive.

________________________________

For AMB’s take on Gone with the Wind, see: (1) Should We Change How We Talk & Write About the Civil War?; (2) How Young is Too Young to Read Gone with the Wind?

11 thoughts on “Mr. AMB on Gone With the Wind (& Looking for the Past in the Future)

  1. Pingback: The Worst Pick-Up Lines in Literature | The Misfortune Of Knowing

  2. Lael

    I loved that book the second my eyes laid themselves on it’s pages. I do wonder, how much I’d enjoy it now as an adult? Something to investigate for sure! I know reading my beloved “Little House” series brought up some intense feelings as an adult. OK, I feel a quest coming on!

  3. I’m so so glad you read it … I could do paragraphs … pages … chapters … on my thoughts about GWTW as well. Just glad you gave it a chance. The theme … the seeing what you want to see … the believing what you want to believe … is sweeping and a TRUE universal. It’s timeless. You have to admire Scarlett’s grit and guts … even while you’re groaning inside at some of her antics.

    I think a lot of us see ourselves in her. At least I know I did, when I was younger, lol!!

    So so glad you posted this.

  4. I first read Gone with the Wind when I was in my mid-teens and I remember enjoying it a lot. I haven’t read it since (and I’ve never seen the movie), but I think it might be time to revisit it.

    While the historical context is difficult to stomach, it is a fiction book, as you say. As this Washington Post article says: “Mitchell’s treatment of black people doesn’t invalidate her still-relevant portrait of white ones”.

    1. I would curious to know what you think of it (if you decide to revisit it). I enjoyed Gone with the Wind much more than I thought I would. It’s a good book. Thanks for stopping by!

I appreciate your comments (respectful dissent is welcome)!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s