Censoring Diversity Under the Guise of “Political Correctness” #BookBanning

nilda-with-case-caption

“He had us all, the way only a pretty [n-word] can.”

That’s what Yunior, the narrator of Junot Díaz’s Nilda, says about his older brother–only he doesn’t abbreviate the racial epithet. Instead, he uses the entire word, quite a few times. Yunior is a Dominican-American teenager who covets his older brother’s girlfriend, a girl with “super-long hair” and “a chest like you wouldn’t believe.” Nilda, a poignant glimpse into Yunior’s life, appeared in The New Yorker at the end of the last millennium.

A few years ago, a teacher in New York City assigned this story to her ninth grade English class, allegedly invoking the ire of school administrators who disapproved of Díaz’s use of the “n-word.” When this happened, the teacher was already struggling with the district over her lesson on the Central Park Five, a tragic case in which five black and Latino teenagers were wrongly convicted of raping a white woman in 1989.

The teacher lost her job, and so she sued the New York City Department of Education, claiming that district officials retaliated against her in violation of her free speech and due process rights. According to the lawsuit, Jeena Lee-Walker v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., et al, an assistant principal allegedly told the teacher to be “way more balanced” in how she taught the Central Park Five case because the administrator “feared that it would unnecessarily ‘rile up’ black students.”* Regarding Junot Díaz’s Nilda, a school administrator allegedly ordered the teacher to remove it from the lesson because of its use of the n-word.

Two weeks ago, on November 23, 2016, a federal court in New York dismissed the teacher’s case. The court concluded that her termination was not a violation of her rights because school districts may “limit the content of school-sponsored speech so long as the limitations are ‘reasonably related to pedagogical concerns’” and the disagreement between the teacher and school administrators regarded “the content and tone of a lesson,” which apparently is not entitled to First Amendment protections.

Courts generally give schools wide latitude when it comes to developing curricula, so I guess I’m not surprised by the outcome. It’s a shame, though.

It’s concerning that the school district would (allegedly) censor a lesson about the Central Park Five based on its fear of “rile[d] up black students.” That stereotype has no place in our educational system, though it’s hardly surprising that it’s there. The educational system harbors and reinforces all the same biases the criminal justice system does.

It’s also concerning that the school district would (allegedly) ban Nilda. I understand how offensive and controversial the n-word is. As I’ve said previously on this blog: “[T]he N-word has extraordinary force in our culture, perhaps greater force than virtually any other bigoted insult.”

School officials have a reason to worry when words that have the power to inflict pain become part of the curriculum, but in this case, we’re not talking about small children. We’re talking about 9th graders, students old enough to understand the harm racial epithets cause and the literary context in which the words are used.

As HLS Professor Randall Kennedy has pointed out, the n-word can “be said in many ways, put to many uses, and mean many things.” The context matters. In Díaz’s story, Yunior does not use the n-word maliciously.

Nevertheless, a school official allegedly ordered the teacher to remove the story from the curriculum, treating it as though it were no different from KKK or neo-nazi literature. Removal of that story from the curriculum silences a diverse voice in a subject in which non-white voices are typically rare: English literature.

That’s unfortunate, especially when the only meaningful exposure some people have to diversity comes through literature. Without it, it’s harder to break down the stereotypes that reinforce our societal biases.

_______________________________________

*Citation: Jeena Lee-Walker v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Educ., et al, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162561 (S.D. N.Y. Nov. 23, 2016). [See the link in the post to read the opinion]

12 thoughts on “Censoring Diversity Under the Guise of “Political Correctness” #BookBanning

  1. Pingback: On Challenging LGBTQ #DiverseKidLit – The Misfortune Of Knowing

  2. Is the teacher going to appeal? You make a good point about the school system being steeped in all the bias and other issues the rest of society is. I would hope school systems would understand this and work to counteract that bias. They are supposed to be educators after all and should be conscious of what they are teaching students.

    1. I wish more people, including educators, were aware of their biases. My children’s district is dealing with an issue right now after a teacher said something racist to a group of African American students after the election. My area is very diverse and strongly voted for Clinton, but these awful biases still exist here. I’m sure that teacher doesn’t consider herself “racist,” but she is, and I wonder how that bias has impacted her ability to teach children of all backgrounds.

      As for the NY case, I don’t know if the teacher will appeal. I think it’s a 30 day window to appeal in the second circuit (but I’m not sure).

      1. Oh no, what a terrible thing to have going on in your school district. The number of times I have heard someone say “I’m not racist” and then say something racist is ridiculous. We all have biases, they are unavoidable, so it’s best to figure out what they are and learn to be aware of them and how to counterbalance them. I hope the issue gets satisfactorily resolved. I also hope the NY teacher gets some sort of justice.

  3. Totally agree. The word, while hateful, needs to be taught to students so they know how hateful and how far back it actually goes. Censoring books that can teach students how to be more tolerant, kind human beings is not a good solution.

    1. “Censoring books that can teach students how to be more tolerant, kind human beings is not a good solution.” Well said! It’s ridiculous that books would be banned for this reason.

  4. I just thought about this topic, because of a news item I saw where a parent is trying to have To Kill a Mockingbird banned because it includes the n-word. Sigh! Simply erasing the word from the curriculum will not teach students how hurtful and degrading its use can be.

    1. It really is ridiculous. I understand wanting to avoid books with racist words or themes–like Little Black Sambo–when children are very young, but by the time they’re in middle school or high school, it doesn’t make any sense. Those kids should be old enough to understand the context.

I appreciate your comments (respectful dissent is welcome)!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s