Lawmakers Want to Take Away Your Right to a Fair Trial #StopHR985

hr-985-beware

Many civil rights and mass torts lawsuits, including cases similar to the one at the heart of Amelia Elkins Elkins, could never happen if Congress passes H.R. 985, the so-called “Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017.”

In Amelia Elkins Elkins, a “courtroom drama” retelling a Jane Austen’s Persuasion, the Elkins family turns to the courts for justice after the matriarch’s untimely death. This fictional lawsuit is similar to real lawsuits happening across the country that stem from unsafe vaginal mesh products made and/or marketed by companies like Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, and Bard. H.R. 985, if passed into law and signed by Trump, would make it harder to bring these types of cases to court by changing the procedures for multidistrict litigation, including by imposing new requirements on where cases can be filed, forcing trial courts to stop cases mid-way through for endless appeals, hampering the settlements of medical device lawsuits, and forcing plaintiffs into trials in courts unfamiliar with their cases unless “all parties” consent to one.

Horrifyingly, H. R. 985 would also impede civil rights lawsuits by making it harder for plaintiffs to bring class actions (an efficient type of lawsuit in which many plaintiffs with similar injuries bring a single case in court). The proposed law imposes a virtually impossible standard for plaintiffs to meet in order to qualify as a “class” for litigation, requiring the proposed class to show that “each member has suffered the same type and scope of injury.” Plaintiffs in class actions have very similar injuries, but not necessarily the same injury because every person’s situation and experience of discrimination is unique.

These are just a few of the many problems with H. R. 985, which is moving eerily fast through Congress. Earlier this week, the House Judiciary Committee passed the bill out of committee without even holding a public hearing. If H.R. 985 becomes the law, we won’t be able to remedy many civil rights violations or hold corporate wrongdoers accountable for the harm they cause to the public.

If you are in the United States, please call your representative in Congress. Please tell them that H. R. 985 is unfair and should not be passed into law. The bill is named the “Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017,” but don’t let its title fool you. There is nothing fair about a law that protects corporations that make unsafe products and helps bigots get around our civil rights laws.

Here’s how you find out who your representative is. If your representative is a member of the House Judiciary Committee, you can see how they voted here (PDF). There is still time to stop this bill because the full House hasn’t voted on it yet.

Here’s a copy of the bill: H. R. 985 (PDF).

Here’s the press release in which H. R. 985’s prime sponsor, Rep. Goodlatte (R-Va), crows about passing it out of committee (achieved without a public hearing) and misstates what the bill does.

For more information on how H.R. 985 threatens our access to justice, check out Litigation and Trial.

Please spread the word about this incredibly unfair and dangerous bill. Thank you!

9 thoughts on “Lawmakers Want to Take Away Your Right to a Fair Trial #StopHR985

  1. Ugh. It just so happens that the sponsor of this bill is my representative. Not that I am surprised. :-/ Thank you for this informative post. I am trying to stay on top of legislative developments, though it’s giving me outrage fatigue. 🙂

  2. How horrible! Thanks for the alert on this! Keith Ellison is my congressional rep so I am pretty sure he will vote against the bill, but I’ll let him know all the same.

  3. Thank you for sharing this. This is important regardless of political affiliation. Most of us can’t imagine the impact of something like this until we find ourselves in the position that we’ve been injured (no one ever thinks: that’ll be me!). And then to try to understand the steps necessary to pursue remedies from the liable party. I work in this world everyday and have learned so much (sometimes stuff I wish I could unlearn). Unfortunately, a lot of this information isn’t widely disseminated which makes it harder for folks to make informed decisions. The talc cases are the first time I’ve seen widespread coverage met with a strong public response. But if you’re in this industry too – you know it’s not that uncommon.

    1. Well said! No one ever thinks, “That’ll be me!” The language of HR 985 looks benign to people who don’t know what litigation is like. My own practice is mostly policy these days, but I’m still involved in civil rights litigation from time to time. I’m also familiar with plaintiffs-side litigation through my husband, who does some mass torts work. I’ve definitely learned some things about litigation (and what corporations can get away with) that I wish weren’t true.

  4. Shared on FB. Don’t you just love how Republicans–for surely they must be behind this–twist the meanings of words to suit their needs? You know, a word like “fairness,” which means something entirely different here. Well, maybe they mean “fair to the elite and corporations,” but they sure aren’t being fair to citizens!

    1. The title of HR 985 is very deceptive. The language of the bill is somewhat deceptive too. It seems so benign to change procedural requirements for class actions. Only people who are familiar with litigation know at first glance how those changes will impact our access to justice. If it passes, HR 985 will dramatically reduce our ability to enforce civil rights laws in this country.

I appreciate your comments (respectful dissent is welcome)!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s