A Truth Universally Acknowledged: Articles About Marriage Must Reference Jane Austen (Even When It Doesn’t Apply)

Pride and Prejudice Opening Line

Did you hear the news that men are happier with smarter wives? That’s how the media has summed up a recent study on marital dissolution rates and education levels.

In The Reversal of the Gender Gap in Education and Trends in Marital Dissolution (August 2014), sociologist Christine R. Schwartz of the University of Wisconsin and analyst Hongyun Han of Northwestern explore marital trends in the United States. Delving into data on American marriages between 1950 and 2004,* Schwartz and Han learn that (1) an increasing number of marriages include a wife who is more highly educated than her husband; (2) these marriages are no longer more likely to end in divorce than marriages in which husbands are more highly educated than their wives; and (3) equally educated spouses are more likely to stay together than spouses in marriages in which the husband is more highly educated than his wife. In the past, marriages with a more highly educated husband were the most stable.**

The researchers suggest that these trends are tied to shifts in cultural norms as we’ve moved away from the husband-as-primary-breadwinner model and toward a more egalitarian model, in which husbands and wives both have responsibilites inside and outside of the home (not that it’s perfect: working women still do the lionshare of the housework!).

I learned of this gender gap study from my husband, who was irritated by The Telegraph’s garbled paraphrase of Jane Austen’s opening line of Pride & Prejudice.***

We all remember that line from Austen’s most beloved novel, right?

As the tongue-in-cheek aphorism goes: “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man, in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.”

The Telegraph opens its article on “Men Are Happier With a Smarter Wife” (with a picture of Colin Firth as Darcy) by inverting Austen’s line, making it:

It was once a truth universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a good fortune had everything a would-be wife could ever want.

But now it appears that it is men who ascribe to Jane Austen’s maxim – and they are the ones quite happy for the woman to be the breadwinner.

Well, it’s fair to say that in Jane Austen’s time, it was common for a woman with no fortune to be in want of a man in possession of one. Take Charlotte Lucas, for example, who thought highly of neither “men or matrimony,” yet still believed that marriage “was the only provision for well-educated young women of small fortune, and however uncertain of giving happiness, must be their pleasantest preservative from want.” But then we have Elizabeth Bennett, our protagonist, for whom Darcy’s large fortune was not enough to overcome his disgusting pride, making it quite a stretch to claim that Jane Austen believed “a single man in possession of a good fortune had everything a would-be wife could ever want.”

It’s an even bigger stretch to say that, as a result of this gender gap study, “now it appears that it is men who ascribe to Jane Austen’s maxim… they are the ones quite happy for the woman to be the breadwinner.”

Yes, the study’s findings are consistent with a shift away from the “traditional ‘breadwinner-homemaker’ model of marriage” —it’s true that an increasing number of women are entering the workforce—but there’s nothing in the study that suggests that men are “quite happy for the woman to be the breadwinner (emphasis added).” The researchers took only a preliminary look at the relative earnings of spouses, leaving “a complete analysis of the relationship between spouses’ relative education, earnings, and divorce to future research.”**** So, this study doesn’t shed much light on whether relationships in which a wife earns more money than her husband is more likely to divorce.

It’s important to remember that higher educational achievement isn’t necessarily correlated with higher earning capacity, particularly for women. Thanks to sex discrimination in the workplace, we still have a sex-segregated workforce (in which there are female-dominated jobs with lower pay) and a pay gap that results in women earning less than men for the same work. In addition, it’s also possible that women with higher levels of education are more likely to stay in unhappy marriages because their educational debt limits their ability to achieve financial independence.

So, while it might be true that more couples in which the wife is more highly educated are staying together, it may also be true that those that are staying together are the ones in which the wife doesn’t actually earn more than her husband.

As a Pew Report from 2013 states:

Despite the fact that mothers are generally more educated than their husbands today, a majority of fathers still earn more than their wives. The share of couples in which the husband’s income exceeds the wife’s was about 75% in 2011. This in part reflects different employment rates between married parents: about 65% of married mothers were employed in 2011, compared with about 90% of fathers. But it also reflects different earning patterns among men and women. Even in dual income families in which both fathers and mothers are working, 70% of these families consist of fathers who earn more than mothers. [See the Complete Report for this quote]

The Pew report also suggests that while attitudes about the makeup of the American family are changing, the pace of change is slow, with half of those who responded to the survey saying that “children are better off if a mother is home and doesn’t hold a job, while just 8% say the same about a father.”

Thus, the “universally acknowledged truths” of Jane Austen’s time—whether or not Austen or her heroines actually ascribed to them—remain entrenched today.

____________________________________________________________

*This study focuses on opposite-sex couples. Few states recognized same-sex marriage by 2004.

**“Stable” defined only as less likely to end in divorce, which doesn’t necessarily mean these are happy families. As the researchers aptly note: “In the 1950s, couples who entered relationships in which wives had more education than their husbands may have been more likely to hold non-traditional beliefs associated with a greater risk of divorce.” One such “non-traditional belief” might be “it’s okay to divorce your husband if he’s abusive.”

***As for Mr. A.M.B., I hope that our similar educational achievements bode well for our marital stability. However, I think an even better sign for our future is that we both love Jane Austen. So far, my husband has read Pride & Prejudice, Sense & Sensibility, and Persuasion. See these posts for his thoughts on these novels: (1) More Reasons Why Pride & Prejudice Isn’t Just For Girls Who Want a Boyfriend; (2) Jane Austen Isn’t Just For Mothers and Daughters (So Says My Husband); (3) Persuasion: Is It Better With Age?

**** The researchers claim in a single paragraph to have found “relative earnings and education operative relatively independently when it comes to trends in the risk of divorce,” but they don’t reveal any of their data or the math they used, instead dismissing the issue with a single vague chart (“Panel D” in “Figure 2”) that apparently blends together all of the economic factors at once.

*****Those interested in Jane Austen should check out Austen in August, founded by Adam at Roof Beam Reader and hosted by Jenna at Lost Generation Reader this year.

 

18 thoughts on “A Truth Universally Acknowledged: Articles About Marriage Must Reference Jane Austen (Even When It Doesn’t Apply)

  1. I guess this is a good thing….but it seems to me that this study is really just poking at one question involved in a very complicated and nuanced subject!

  2. This is fascinating! I love that you point out that just because a woman has a higher degree of education, her husband could very well still earn more than she does. A female oriented profession, say social work, typically requires a master’s degree and pays CRAP. IT professionals, a traditionally male dominated field, can easily outstrip the salaries of MSW’s with an associate’s or bachelor’s degree. I’m neither a social worker nor an IT professional. I have no statistics to back up my statements, though I’m pretty sure I’m right anyway. RAWR feminist Katie is annoyed by this! I don’t think you and Mr. AMB have anything to worry about- a mutual love of Jane Austen can mean nothing less than lifelong happiness, right?!

  3. I wonder how they get these statistics? I am much more educated than my husband and that has never been an issue. I think many other things play a part in the dissolution of a marriage, many things they cannot qualify or even know.

  4. This is really interesting…I always take these polls with a pinch of salt as generalizations are always inevitable…and it never keeps in mind that this could really vary based on cultural and socioeconomic background.
    Would be nice if it was true though lol

  5. I often wonder how one comes by these ‘research; jobs which add nothing to the sum of human knowledge. I’m halfway through P&P and certainly it’s a fascinating window on attitudes which prevailed 200 years ago. For example I don’t think there’s mention at all of ‘working class’ people besides the odd faithful retainer. Men and women of class seemed to exist on different planes, S-E-X hasn’t been invented it seems. I wish I’d read it years ago.

    1. Yeah, Pride and Prejudice is a very interesting perspective on the Regency Era. That’s why it’s much more than a book for “silly” girls who just want boyfriends (as some people claim). Are you enjoying it so far?

      1. Now I’ve settled in to the style of writing, which took some adjusting to, it’s very absorbing. It’s a window on a world that has gone. Also Miss Austen is amazingly perceptive on female outlook and attitude. I might actually re-read the first part to better understand it.

  6. Great post! My husband likes Jane Austen too, which I think is what will give our relationship its staying power. 😉

    It is interesting to see the trends shifting over time, however slowly. I am the main bread winner in our family–and I also have the higher education (although it can be argued we’re close enough–I got my graduate degree, he decided not to pursue his after completing a year and a half of the 2 year program). Admittedly, I still do most of the housework–but he more than makes up for it in other ways. I think we definitely balance each other out, not to mention work well together.

    1. Ha! Yeah, I bet that has an impact in some relationships, and then there are probably other relationships in which women just accept that they should make less (particularly if the higher educated spouse is in a traditionally female dominated, relatively low paying field like social work). We need to pick up the pace of cultural change.

      1. Instead of returning to the nineteenth century as the GOP would like? *snort* Yes. Progress would solve a lot of our problems, but only if it’s in the right direction. More capitalism, for instance, would be bad.

    1. Thanks for the link! That’s an interesting survey. I’ve only taken a quick look at the article, but I don’t think it’s entirely at odds with the Schwartz/Han gender gap study. First, they are looking at different countries, and it’s possible that the entrenchment of cultural norms is different in these places. Second, perceptions of “intelligence” and education level are correlated, but not the same, and I’d have to see the questions that were asked in the survey. Third, the Schwartz study is about marital stability, which is a little different from what the survey asked (assuming the article is portraying it accurately). Four, relationships are complicated and difficult to study. So, maybe they’re both right in limited ways. Overall, though, the article definitely comports with my own perception of the continued effect of gender stereotypes on relationships. I hope more men are appreciating women for their intelligence–I know many who do–but I don’t know if cultural norms have changed that much yet.

      Thanks for the comment!

I appreciate your comments (respectful dissent is welcome)!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s